Skip to content

Under the Limit

Developments in Canadian limitations jurisprudence

Recent Posts

  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms an expired limitation period doesn’t extinguish debt
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms a disability doesn’t necessary suspend the limitation period
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal sort of confirms Limitations Act applies to will challenges
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal on the knowledge required to plausibly infer liability
  • Ontario: the limitation of a solicitor-initiated assessment

Categories

  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Federal
  • Manitoba
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Nova Scotia
  • Ontario
  • Saskatchewan
  • Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized

Tags

  • "claim"
  • Adding a claim
  • Adding a party
  • Alberta Court of Appeal
  • Amendments
  • Appeals
  • Appropriateness
  • Blog pedantry
  • Civil procedure
  • Claims not causes of action
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability
  • Discoverability Doctrine
  • Discoverability principles
  • Discovery
  • Due Diligence
  • Estates
  • Evidentiary burdens
  • Fun with amendments
  • Insurance
  • Legal appropriateness
  • Misnomer
  • Motor Vehical Accident
  • Ontario Act
  • Ontario Act s. 1
  • Ontario Act s. 5
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(a)(iv)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(b)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(2)
  • Ontario Act s. 7
  • Ontario Act s. 16(1)(a)
  • Ontario Act s. 18
  • Ontario Act s. 21
  • Ontario Court of Appeal
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act s. 4
  • Ontario Trustee Act s. 38
  • Pleading
  • Pleadings
  • Please excuse my pedantry
  • Real Property
  • Real Property Limitations Act
  • Special circumstances
  • Summary judgment

Recent Posts

  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms an expired limitation period doesn’t extinguish debt
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms a disability doesn’t necessary suspend the limitation period
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal sort of confirms Limitations Act applies to will challenges
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal on the knowledge required to plausibly infer liability
  • Ontario: the limitation of a solicitor-initiated assessment

Archives

  • August 2025
  • February 2024
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • January 2021
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Federal
  • Manitoba
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Nova Scotia
  • Ontario
  • Saskatchewan
  • Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized

Tags

  • "claim"
  • Adding a claim
  • Adding a party
  • Alberta Court of Appeal
  • Amendments
  • Appeals
  • Appropriateness
  • Blog pedantry
  • Civil procedure
  • Claims not causes of action
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability
  • Discoverability Doctrine
  • Discoverability principles
  • Discovery
  • Due Diligence
  • Estates
  • Evidentiary burdens
  • Fun with amendments
  • Insurance
  • Legal appropriateness
  • Misnomer
  • Motor Vehical Accident
  • Ontario Act
  • Ontario Act s. 1
  • Ontario Act s. 5
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(a)(iv)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(b)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(2)
  • Ontario Act s. 7
  • Ontario Act s. 16(1)(a)
  • Ontario Act s. 18
  • Ontario Act s. 21
  • Ontario Court of Appeal
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act s. 4
  • Ontario Trustee Act s. 38
  • Pleading
  • Pleadings
  • Please excuse my pedantry
  • Real Property
  • Real Property Limitations Act
  • Special circumstances
  • Summary judgment

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Ontario: extending FLA s. 7(3) limitation period

Ramoutar v. Ramoutar considers whether to grant an extension of the limitation period in s. 7(3) of the Family Law Act pursuant to s. 2(8). It’s a worth a review if you have a family law practice.

Posted on December 31, 2021Author DanCategories OntarioTags Ontario Family Law Act, Ontario Family Law Act s. 2(8), Ontario Family Law Act s. 7(3)

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Ontario: common law discovery and s. 4 of the RPLA
Next Next post: Ontario: failing the litigation finger test
Proudly powered by WordPress