Skip to content

Under the Limit

Developments in Canadian limitations jurisprudence

Recent Posts

  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms an expired limitation period doesn’t extinguish debt
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms a disability doesn’t necessary suspend the limitation period
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal sort of confirms Limitations Act applies to will challenges
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal on the knowledge required to plausibly infer liability
  • Ontario: the limitation of a solicitor-initiated assessment

Categories

  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Federal
  • Manitoba
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Nova Scotia
  • Ontario
  • Saskatchewan
  • Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized

Tags

  • "claim"
  • Adding a claim
  • Adding a party
  • Alberta Court of Appeal
  • Amendments
  • Appeals
  • Appropriateness
  • Blog pedantry
  • Civil procedure
  • Claims not causes of action
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability
  • Discoverability Doctrine
  • Discoverability principles
  • Discovery
  • Due Diligence
  • Estates
  • Evidentiary burdens
  • Fun with amendments
  • Insurance
  • Legal appropriateness
  • Misnomer
  • Motor Vehical Accident
  • Ontario Act
  • Ontario Act s. 1
  • Ontario Act s. 5
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(a)(iv)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(b)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(2)
  • Ontario Act s. 7
  • Ontario Act s. 16(1)(a)
  • Ontario Act s. 18
  • Ontario Act s. 21
  • Ontario Court of Appeal
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act s. 4
  • Ontario Trustee Act s. 38
  • Pleading
  • Pleadings
  • Please excuse my pedantry
  • Real Property
  • Real Property Limitations Act
  • Special circumstances
  • Summary judgment

Recent Posts

  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms an expired limitation period doesn’t extinguish debt
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms a disability doesn’t necessary suspend the limitation period
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal sort of confirms Limitations Act applies to will challenges
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal on the knowledge required to plausibly infer liability
  • Ontario: the limitation of a solicitor-initiated assessment

Archives

  • August 2025
  • February 2024
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • January 2021
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Federal
  • Manitoba
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Nova Scotia
  • Ontario
  • Saskatchewan
  • Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized

Tags

  • "claim"
  • Adding a claim
  • Adding a party
  • Alberta Court of Appeal
  • Amendments
  • Appeals
  • Appropriateness
  • Blog pedantry
  • Civil procedure
  • Claims not causes of action
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability
  • Discoverability Doctrine
  • Discoverability principles
  • Discovery
  • Due Diligence
  • Estates
  • Evidentiary burdens
  • Fun with amendments
  • Insurance
  • Legal appropriateness
  • Misnomer
  • Motor Vehical Accident
  • Ontario Act
  • Ontario Act s. 1
  • Ontario Act s. 5
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(a)(iv)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(b)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(2)
  • Ontario Act s. 7
  • Ontario Act s. 16(1)(a)
  • Ontario Act s. 18
  • Ontario Act s. 21
  • Ontario Court of Appeal
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act s. 4
  • Ontario Trustee Act s. 38
  • Pleading
  • Pleadings
  • Please excuse my pedantry
  • Real Property
  • Real Property Limitations Act
  • Special circumstances
  • Summary judgment

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms a disability doesn’t necessary suspend the limitation period

The Court of Appeal decision in Bell v. Long makes the point that a disability per se does not necessarily mean a person is incapable within the meaning of s. 7 of the Limitations Act.

Posted on August 13, 2025Author DanCategories OntarioTags Disability, Incapacity, It's not a tumour, Ontario Act s. 7, Ontario Court of Appeal

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Ontario: Court of Appeal sort of confirms Limitations Act applies to will challenges
Next Next post: Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms an expired limitation period doesn’t extinguish debt
Proudly powered by WordPress