Skip to content

Under the Limit

Developments in Canadian limitations jurisprudence

Recent Posts

  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms an expired limitation period doesn’t extinguish debt
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal confirms a disability doesn’t necessary suspend the limitation period
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal sort of confirms Limitations Act applies to will challenges
  • Ontario: Court of Appeal on the knowledge required to plausibly infer liability
  • Ontario: the limitation of a solicitor-initiated assessment

Categories

  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Federal
  • Manitoba
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Nova Scotia
  • Ontario
  • Saskatchewan
  • Supreme Court
  • Uncategorized

Tags

  • "claim"
  • Adding a claim
  • Adding a party
  • Alberta Court of Appeal
  • Amendments
  • Appeals
  • Appropriateness
  • Blog pedantry
  • Civil procedure
  • Claims not causes of action
  • Contribution and Indemnity
  • Discoverability
  • Discoverability Doctrine
  • Discoverability principles
  • Discovery
  • Due Diligence
  • Estates
  • Evidentiary burdens
  • Fun with amendments
  • Insurance
  • Legal appropriateness
  • Misnomer
  • Motor Vehical Accident
  • Ontario Act
  • Ontario Act s. 1
  • Ontario Act s. 5
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(a)(iv)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(1)(b)
  • Ontario Act s. 5(2)
  • Ontario Act s. 7
  • Ontario Act s. 16(1)(a)
  • Ontario Act s. 18
  • Ontario Act s. 21
  • Ontario Court of Appeal
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act
  • Ontario Real Property Limitations Act s. 4
  • Ontario Trustee Act s. 38
  • Pleading
  • Pleadings
  • Please excuse my pedantry
  • Real Property
  • Real Property Limitations Act
  • Special circumstances
  • Summary judgment

Ontario: a limitations defence properly determined under r. 21.01

Dugalin v. Canada (Attorney General) is another example of a limitations motion properly brought under r. 21.01(b).  The Statement of Claim pleaded facts determinative of the limitations defence.

 

Posted on May 30, 2020Author DanCategories OntarioTags Civil procedure, Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure r. 21, Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure r. 21.01(1)(b)

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Ontario: the limitations implications of withdrawing a claim
Next Next post: Ontario: stop arguing common law discovery
Proudly powered by WordPress