{"id":679,"date":"2018-03-02T19:25:26","date_gmt":"2018-03-02T23:25:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/?p=679"},"modified":"2018-03-02T19:25:26","modified_gmt":"2018-03-02T23:25:26","slug":"ontario-representation-orders-and-misnomer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/?p=679","title":{"rendered":"Ontario: Representation orders and misnomer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In <a href=\"http:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/h38cr\"><em>Lawrence v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 773<\/em><\/a>, the Court of Appeal states that a request for a representation order to sue a trade union under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ontario.ca\/laws\/regulation\/900194\" target=\"_blank\">r. 12.08<\/a> can be a request to correct a misnomer.\u00a0 There was a dissent from Justice Hourigan:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">[51]\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Worse, the method chosen to achieve that result is ill-suited for its purpose. The motion judge found that the order the respondent sought was properly characterized as a motion to correct an error in the title of proceedings under r. 5.04(2). In my view, she erred in so finding. This is not a misnomer case, as there is no question that Local 773 was correctly named. This is a case where there has been non-compliance with a statutory requirement and a new party has been added. One need only look to the form of the order granted by the motion judge. She did not make an order under r. 5.04(2); rather she made a representation order.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Lawrence v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 773, the Court of Appeal states that a request for a representation order to sue a trade union under r. 12.08 can be a request to correct a misnomer.\u00a0 There was a dissent from Justice Hourigan: [51]\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Worse, the method chosen to achieve that result &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/?p=679\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Ontario: Representation orders and misnomer<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[410,407,43,408,409],"class_list":["post-679","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ontario","tag-i-should-have-been-an-electrician","tag-misnomer","tag-ontario-court-of-appeal","tag-representation-order","tag-trade-union"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=679"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/679\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":680,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/679\/revisions\/680"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}