{"id":526,"date":"2016-11-05T17:43:29","date_gmt":"2016-11-05T21:43:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/?p=526"},"modified":"2016-11-05T17:44:00","modified_gmt":"2016-11-05T21:44:00","slug":"ontario-a-limitations-defence-must-be-pleaded","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/?p=526","title":{"rendered":"Ontario: A limitations defence must be pleaded"},"content":{"rendered":"

In Singh v. Trump<\/em><\/a>, Justice Perell dismissed a plaintiff’s claim as time-barred despite the defendants not pleading the Limitations Act<\/a>, seeking leave to amend to plead it, or raising it in their written submissions. \u00a0His reasons neither refer to the fact that the defence was\u00a0not pleaded nor explain why, in the absence of the plea, he should invoke the Limitations Act.<\/p>\n

In the circumstances, the Court of Appeal found that it was not appropriate for Justice Perell to invoke the Limitations Act and dismiss the claim as statute-barred.\u00a0 A limitations defence is an affirmative defence and must be\u00a0pleaded.\u00a0 Justice Rouleau’s decision provides a helpful overview of the relevant jurisprudence:<\/p>\n

\n

[<\/a>132]\u00a0\u00a0 This court has consistently held that \u201c[t]he expiry of a limitation period is a defence to an action that must be pleaded in a statement of defence\u201d: Collins v.<\/em> Cortez<\/em>, 2014 ONCA 685<\/span> (CanLII)<\/a>, [2014] O.J. No. 4753<\/span>, at para. 10<\/span>, per van Rensburg J.A. (citing S. (W.E.) v. P. (M.M.)<\/em> (2000), 2000 CanLII 16831 (ON CA)<\/a>, 50 O.R. (3d) 70 (C.A.)<\/span>, at paras. 37-38<\/span>, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, [2001] 149 O.A.C. 397<\/span><\/span>). This requirement is embodied in rule 25.07(4)<\/a> of the Rules of Civil Procedure<\/a><\/em>, which Ontario courts have consistently held \u201capplies to pleadings relating to limitations that might bar an action\u201d: S. (W.E.) v. P. (M.M.)<\/em>, at para. 37. <\/em>Rule 25.07(4)<\/a> provides as follows:<\/p>\n

In a defence, a party shall plead any matter on which the party intends to rely to defeat the claim of the opposite party and which, if not specifically pleaded, might take the opposite party by surprise or raise an issue that has not been raised in the opposite party\u2019s pleading.<\/p>\n

[<\/a>133]\u00a0\u00a0 Justice Cronk explained the rationale behind the requirement that a party specifically plead a limitation period defence in Hav-A-Kar Leasing Ltd. v. Vekselshtein<\/em>, 2012 ONCA 826<\/span> (CanLII)<\/a>, 225 A.C.W.S. (3d) 237<\/span>, at para. 69<\/span>:<\/p>\n

The failure to raise substantive responses to a plaintiff’s claims until trial or, worse, until the close of trial, is contrary to the spirit and requirements of theRules of Civil Procedure<\/a> and the goal of fair contest that underlies those Rules. Such a failure also undermines the important principle that the parties to a civil lawsuit are entitled to have their differences resolved on the basis of the issues joined in the pleadings.<\/p>\n

[<\/a>134]\u00a0\u00a0 In S. (W.E.) v. P. (M.M.),<\/em> MacPherson J.A. confirmed that Ontario courts \u201chave consistently held that rule 25.07(4)<\/a> applies to pleadings relating to limitations that might bar an action\u201d: at para. 37. He went on to explain that even though in that case the trial judge had given counsel time to prepare submissions on the issue after he raised it during closing arguments, it did not remove the potential prejudice to P:<\/p>\n

If S had raised the issue in his pleadings, P might have tried to settle, or even have abandoned, her counterclaim. Either decision might have had costs consequences. Another potential source of prejudice arises from the fact that counsel for P might have adopted different tactics at trial. In particular, counsel might have called different or additional evidence to support an argument that the discoverability principle applied (at para. 38).<\/p>\n

[<\/a>135]\u00a0\u00a0 MacPherson J.A. also noted that at no time during trial, including during closing arguments when the trial judge raised the limitation issue, did S seek to amend his pleadings. Nor did he seek such an amendment during the appeal hearing.<\/p>\n

[<\/a>136]\u00a0\u00a0 In my view, the defendants\u2019 failure, in this case, to plead a Limitations Act<\/em> defence or even to seek an amendment to their pleading to do so is, as it was in S. (W.E.) v. P. (M.M.)<\/em>, fatal.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In Singh v. Trump, Justice Perell dismissed a plaintiff’s claim as time-barred despite the defendants not pleading the Limitations Act, seeking leave to amend to plead it, or raising it in their written submissions. \u00a0His reasons neither refer to the fact that the defence was\u00a0not pleaded nor explain why, in the absence of the plea, … Continue reading Ontario: A limitations defence must be pleaded<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[288,43,36,289],"class_list":["post-526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ontario","tag-affirmative-defence","tag-ontario-court-of-appeal","tag-pleading","tag-trump-is-inescapable"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=526"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/526\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":528,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/526\/revisions\/528"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/limitations.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}